<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Everyone is Picking Against the Twins in the AL Central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puckettspond.com/2011/02/13/not-everyone-is-picking-against-the-twins-in-the-al-central/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puckettspond.com/2011/02/13/not-everyone-is-picking-against-the-twins-in-the-al-central/</link>
	<description>A Minnesota Twins Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally Fish</title>
		<link>http://puckettspond.com/2011/02/13/not-everyone-is-picking-against-the-twins-in-the-al-central/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puckettspond.com/?p=3307#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Well again it just depends on the source and how they feel about each team&#039;s flaws. There are sources out there that have the Twins solidly in 3rd clearly behind Detroit and Chicago. It is my impression that most sources view it as a 3-team toss up or have the Twins picked as the favorite. 

Erin is correct in her assessment that a lot of the pessimism surrounding the Twins comes from the fanbase of the team more than other sources. That was part of what I was trying to get at, but I think I missed the mark a bit when it comes to conveying that in the above.

Personally, I still think the Twins are the front runner to win the division and I don&#039;t think that the gap has closed all that much. But I say that being of the belief that Nishi is going to be an upgrade over Hudson and that a bullpen is the easiest thing to rebuild/overhaul with &quot;spare parts&quot; from one season to the next.

I&#039;ll get into my rationale and reasoning with an in depth column (in the next month or so) but barring some significant shifts in the AL Central landscape I&#039;ll be picking the Twins in 1st place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well again it just depends on the source and how they feel about each team&#8217;s flaws. There are sources out there that have the Twins solidly in 3rd clearly behind Detroit and Chicago. It is my impression that most sources view it as a 3-team toss up or have the Twins picked as the favorite. </p>
<p>Erin is correct in her assessment that a lot of the pessimism surrounding the Twins comes from the fanbase of the team more than other sources. That was part of what I was trying to get at, but I think I missed the mark a bit when it comes to conveying that in the above.</p>
<p>Personally, I still think the Twins are the front runner to win the division and I don&#8217;t think that the gap has closed all that much. But I say that being of the belief that Nishi is going to be an upgrade over Hudson and that a bullpen is the easiest thing to rebuild/overhaul with &#8220;spare parts&#8221; from one season to the next.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll get into my rationale and reasoning with an in depth column (in the next month or so) but barring some significant shifts in the AL Central landscape I&#8217;ll be picking the Twins in 1st place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hannum</title>
		<link>http://puckettspond.com/2011/02/13/not-everyone-is-picking-against-the-twins-in-the-al-central/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hannum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puckettspond.com/?p=3307#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>Given the margin between them last year, I think all &#039;analysts&#039; are saying is that the White Sox &amp; Tigers may have gained enough ground in the offseason that a Twins victory is not a foregone conclusion.  Even those &#039;analysts&#039; who write for Tigers blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the margin between them last year, I think all &#8216;analysts&#8217; are saying is that the White Sox &amp; Tigers may have gained enough ground in the offseason that a Twins victory is not a foregone conclusion.  Even those &#8216;analysts&#8217; who write for Tigers blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://puckettspond.com/2011/02/13/not-everyone-is-picking-against-the-twins-in-the-al-central/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puckettspond.com/?p=3307#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to imply that the entire mainstream media was picking against the Twins; actually most of the pessimism seems to be coming from the fanbase.  I was merely trying to point out that the Tigers and White Sox have problems of their own, and that no one should be considered the favorite to win the division at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that the entire mainstream media was picking against the Twins; actually most of the pessimism seems to be coming from the fanbase.  I was merely trying to point out that the Tigers and White Sox have problems of their own, and that no one should be considered the favorite to win the division at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 26/33 queries in 0.052 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 309/340 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: puckettspond.com @ 2013-05-26 00:05:13 by W3 Total Cache -->